(CLICK THE ARTICLE BELOW)http://overfishing.org/pages/why_is_overfishing_a_problem.php
THEN:
Answer the following questions:
1. What are some statistics that really made an impact on you?
2.What are some possible solutions to this problem?
3. What does this article mean to you? Does it change your view on eating fish?
1. What are some statistics that really made an impact on you?
ReplyDelete2.What are some possible solutions to this problem?
3. What does this article mean to you? Does it change your view on eating fish?
1. Some statistics that made an impact on me were 52% of fish stocks are fully exploited and 20% are moderately exploited.
2. some solution to this problem are making the fishing season shorter and making sure that there are enough fish to catch without taking all of them.
3. To me, this article shows that we need to be more conservative with fishing. My view on eating fish hasn't changed because I only eat fish once in a while.
1. The statistics that really made an impact on me are 52% of fish stocks are fully exploited and 17% of fish stocks are over exploited.
ReplyDelete2. A possible solution to this problem is growing for fish domestically and limiting fishing.
3. Tom e the article shows we take our oceans for granted and that we might soon use it up. It does not change my view because I rarely have eaten fish.
1. These statistics showed me the reality of fish stocks in our oceans today. The ones that impacted me the most were that 52% of fish stocks are fully exploited and only 1% is recovered from depletion.
ReplyDelete2. A possible solution to his problem would be to change the season to be shorter, and making better use of the caught fish. This way fewer would go to waste.
3. This article showed me that we are overusing and wasting our oceans resources. It doesn't affect my view on eating fish, because it isn't something I often do.
1. The stats that impacted me were that 52% of fish stocks are fully exploited and around 17-20% are moderately exploited.
ReplyDelete2. A solution to this problem is to shorten the fishing season and become more efficient with the fish caught.
3. This article portrays to me that our oceans' habitat are being abused by overused. There must be a limit. I don't eat fish often so this does not affect my view.
1.The statastictics that really made an impact on me is that 52% of fish stocks are fully exploited.
ReplyDelete2. a solution to this problem is to not fish so much, and fishermen should only be able to catch a certain amount of fish not unlimited amounts.
3. This article means to me that today people are not thinking about their actions affects on the oceans. It does change my view on eating fish, it makes me not want to eat it as much.
1. Some statistics that really made an impact on me is that 52% of fish stocks are fully exploited and that 17% are overexploited.
ReplyDelete2. Some possible solutions to this problem is making the fishing season shorter and allowing better use for the fish that have been caught to decrease the amount of wasting.
3. This article means to me that we are wasting the resources that our oceans provide for use in this case, fish. But it does not change my opinion because I do not eat fish.
1. The statistics that made an impact on me is that 52% of fish stocks are fully exploited and that 17% are overexploited.
ReplyDelete2. Some possible solutions is to by making a limit on how many fish you are allowed to catch.
3. This article means to me that we need to be careful about catching fish.No it does not change my view on eating fish.
1. the statistic that impacted me was that 80% of sharks and other large marine animals captured by fisheries are discarded.
ReplyDelete2. A possible solution would be for somebody to find a use for these discarded animals or to release them after they're caught.
3. This article means to me that we are wasteful in our use and abuse of the marine environment and we need to be careful about the way we use the ocean.
1. The most interesting fact to me was that 80% of fisheries are fully exploited to depleted
ReplyDelete2. The most reasonable solution is to cut back on the number of ships sent out in the fisheries because it is way over the ammount needed amd another way is to be informed and tell others.
3. This article did not make me not want to eat fish but instead it help me realize to be informed on what fish to eat because others may be exploited.
1) No places that are over fished are recovering, and 90% of the stocks of large predatory fish are already gone.
ReplyDelete2) Some possible solutions are safe catch limits, and control on bycatch, protecting there habitat and finally making sure these rules are enforced.
3) I believe that we use to much of of resources, and that should be strongly regulated. It haunt changed my view on eating fish because I hardly ever eat fish. However, I believe fishing should be cut down so we don't waste our resources.